What I think about Brownback: Earth revolves around Sun
June 1st, 2007
Sam Brownback, one of three Republican candidates for President who recently copped to not believing in evolution, has an op-ed in today’s New York Times about how his belief in creationism doesn’t totally 100% put him at odds with evolutionary theory.
boy, we sure are looking like a bunch of hayseeds here in the U.S., eh,
with this whole evolution thing?

however, while we may not have affordable health care or intelligent leaders in the U.S.,
we do have fruit
these luscious strawberries, found in Cleveland, are so cheap!
they aren’t even moldy!
(if you aren’t from Saipan, you won’t understand why this is a big deal.
but if you are from Saipan: not moldy!!!!)
Brownback says he believes in the *fact* of evolution - that fossils exist, that species change over time, that advantageous mutations will be passed from one organism to another.
But he’s rejecting any *theory* of evolution - any explanation of why and how evolution happens - that doesn’t comport with his religious belief. Got that? Science must comport with religion, in Brownback’s world. If a biologist says one thing about evolution, and the pope disagrees, it is the biologist who is wrong. (Wikipedia has a good explanation of evolutionary fact v. theory. And just incidentally - poking around to find out about “evolutionary theory” led me to what I think might be the funniest headline ever).
From the piece:
“The unique and special place of each and every person in creation is a fundamental truth that must be safeguarded. I am wary of any theory that seeks to undermine man’s essential dignity and unique and intended place in the cosmos. I firmly believe that each human person, regardless of circumstance, was willed into being and made for a purpose.
While no stone should be left unturned in seeking to discover the nature of man’s origins, we can say with conviction that we know with certainty at least part of the outcome. Man was not an accident and reflects an image and likeness unique in the created order. Those aspects of evolutionary theory compatible with this truth are a welcome addition to human knowledge. Aspects of these theories that undermine this truth, however, should be firmly rejected as an atheistic theology posing as science.”
“Athiestic theology posing as science”! This is in the newspaper of record!
When I was in India earlier in the year, I was really struck by a number of things - (funny list of things here, you get the picture). One of the most striking things was that no one - except some really well-educated lawyers and engineers - told me that they wanted to come to America.
It used to be that when I traveled everywhere except for Europe and possibly Canada, Japan, Australia, and New Zealand, a whole lot of people would gratuitously tell me that they were big fans of the United States and that their dream was to move to America. Ten years ago in Tunisia, for example, I’d hear from people how great America is - and as proof of this greatness, people would often say, excitedly, “Michael Jackson!” Michael Jackson had once given a concert in Tunisia and he had left a great impression (insert joke here, haha).
In India this past spring, by contrast, very few people said they liked the U.S. A lot of people, however, told me that they are supporters of Saddam Hussein. We even saw a bunch of Saddam Hussein streets - with street signs! These streets named for Hussein after his execution. We couldn’t get straight answers about why people like Saddam Hussein so much - I am still kind of a nincompoop about languages - but the thrust of what I did gather is that people like Saddam because they dislike the U.S. and find the U.S. to be a little, how do we say this, arrogant.
This country is in trouble if small villages in India are naming roads after Saddam Hussein. That’s my opinion on the matter. The U.S. needs more friends in the world, and presidential candidates talking about “athiestic theology posing as science” are not going to endear the U.S. to anyone else, I shouldn’t think.
but let me interrupt this post for a moment for a bit of entertainment
go see the movie Hot Fuzz at your earliest convenience
B. and I saw it in DC last week. It is the funniest movie I have ever seen. Funnier, even, than Beerfest, which was pretty fricking funny.

I took this photo during the movie to see how a photo of a movie screen would come out. Rather well, I think. No?
Hot Fuzz about this London cop who gets sent to a small town
(he’s been sent there because he’s too good a cop;
he’s making everyone else on the force - er, squad - look bad).
So in this small town, he gets caught up in a murder mystery
and a rather sweet love story.
And at one point, when he’s talking to one of the townspeople about the murders and giving his theory about them, the person says:
“Why should I listen to you? You’re not even from around here.”
(insert observation about small town/island living here)
Actually, this “why should I listen to you” is basically what Brownback is saying, too,
if I can make an attenuated connection here.
in sum, go see the Hot Fuzz
it is hilarious
but it’s time to leave the Inquisition behind
Rick Vaughn said:
Who says you need to believe in evolution to be considered intelligent? And if you don’t believe in evolution it makes you some lame uncool right-wing wacko who wants to take everybody’s personal freedoms away?
Arin said:
Hi Rick - I think people outside the US read Brownback, and wonder if our beliefs are as nutty as this:
http://www.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1178708655924&pagename=JPost/JPArticle/ShowFull
How are you enjoying Korea?
Arin
Arin said:
Hi Rick - I think people outside the US read Brownback, and wonder if our beliefs are as nutty as the fatwa in Egypt that allows adult men to breastfeed from their female colleagues (see today’s NY Times for more).
How are you enjoying Korea?
Arin
Arin said:
ok, I clearly have a thing or two to learn about leaving comments on my own website.